Liberals, it has been said, are generous with other peoples' money, except when it comes to questions of natio... — William F. Buckley, Jr.

Liberals, it has been said, are generous with other peoples' money, except when it comes to questions of national survival when they prefer to be generous with other people's freedom and security.

Author: William F. Buckley, Jr.

Insight: This quote cuts at something real about how people's values can seem to flip depending on the stakes. Most of us will enthusiastically spend money on causes we believe in—someone else's budget, it turns out, is always easier to be bold with. But when we feel genuinely threatened, even the most open-minded tend to tighten up around freedoms, wanting stronger walls and more security theater. It's worth noticing in yourself: are you more willing to restrict someone else's privacy or liberty in the name of safety than you'd be to spend your own money on their benefit? The uncomfortable part is that Buckley isn't entirely wrong, even if his phrasing is sharp-edged and political. We do tend to trade away freedoms we don't personally use or value—surveilling someone else's online activity, supporting stricter rules for groups we're suspicious of. It feels abstract and victimless. Meanwhile, we resist paying taxes the same way we resist giving to causes we didn't choose. The difference is that money can be earned back, but freedoms, once surrendered during crisis, rarely return intact. That asymmetry deserves thinking about before we're rushing to solve the next emergency.

When fear trades freedom for safety

Liberals, it has been said, are generous with other peoples' money, except when it comes to questions of national survival when they prefer to be generous with other people's freedom and security.

This quote cuts at something real about how people's values can seem to flip depending on the stakes. Most of us will enthusiastically spend money on causes we believe in—someone else's budget, it turns out, is always easier to be bold with. But when we feel genuinely threatened, even the most open-minded tend to tighten up around freedoms, wanting stronger walls and more security theater. It's worth noticing in yourself: are you more willing to restrict someone else's privacy or liberty in the name of safety than you'd be to spend your own money on their benefit?

The uncomfortable part is that Buckley isn't entirely wrong, even if his phrasing is sharp-edged and political. We do tend to trade away freedoms we don't personally use or value—surveilling someone else's online activity, supporting stricter rules for groups we're suspicious of. It feels abstract and victimless. Meanwhile, we resist paying taxes the same way we resist giving to causes we didn't choose. The difference is that money can be earned back, but freedoms, once surrendered during crisis, rarely return intact. That asymmetry deserves thinking about before we're rushing to solve the next emergency.

AI generated

Comments

Sign in to leave a comment or reply to one.

Sign in

William F. Buckley, Jr.

William F. Buckley, Jr. was an influential American conservative author, commentator, and founder of the National Review magazine, which played a pivotal role in shaping modern conservatism in the United States. Born on November 24, 1925, he was also known for his wit and eloquence as a television host of the show "Firing Line," where he debated various political and cultural issues. Buckley wrote numerous books and articles, establishing himself as a central figure in American political thought until his death on February 27, 2008.

Graph

Related