It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions... — Thomas Sowell

It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.

Author: Thomas Sowell

Insight: When someone recommends a restaurant but doesn't eat there themselves, or suggests an investment they're not making, you notice the gap right away. But we rarely stop to see how often we've actually built this problem into our institutions and habits. Teachers who don't send their kids to the schools they run. Politicians who exempt themselves from the laws they pass. Advisors who profit whether their advice works or fails. The incentive structure is all wrong, and Sowell's point cuts straight to why: when there's no real consequence for being wrong, the decision-maker doesn't have to live with the actual results. This matters more than it feels like it should. It's not really about stupidity—it's about attention. Someone who'll bear the cost of a bad decision thinks harder about it. They ask tougher questions. They lose sleep. Someone insulated from the outcome can afford to be glib, overconfident, or simply careless. They optimize for looking good in the moment instead of being right in the long run. The unsettling part is recognizing how often we're the person making decisions we won't pay for—recommending solutions we don't live with, or letting others decide for us because we assume they're bearing the risk too.

Decisions Without Consequences

It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.

When someone recommends a restaurant but doesn't eat there themselves, or suggests an investment they're not making, you notice the gap right away. But we rarely stop to see how often we've actually built this problem into our institutions and habits. Teachers who don't send their kids to the schools they run. Politicians who exempt themselves from the laws they pass. Advisors who profit whether their advice works or fails. The incentive structure is all wrong, and Sowell's point cuts straight to why: when there's no real consequence for being wrong, the decision-maker doesn't have to live with the actual results.

This matters more than it feels like it should. It's not really about stupidity—it's about attention. Someone who'll bear the cost of a bad decision thinks harder about it. They ask tougher questions. They lose sleep. Someone insulated from the outcome can afford to be glib, overconfident, or simply careless. They optimize for looking good in the moment instead of being right in the long run.

The unsettling part is recognizing how often we're the person making decisions we won't pay for—recommending solutions we don't live with, or letting others decide for us because we assume they're bearing the risk too.

AI generated

Comments

Sign in to leave a comment or reply to one.

Sign in

Thomas Sowell

Thomas Sowell was an American economist, social theorist, and author known for his work in the fields of economics, social policy, and race relations. He was a prolific writer, with numerous books and articles that provided insights into issues such as affirmative action, education, and the role of government in society.

Graph

Related