I have nothing against respecting people who lived before, but we have no responsibility toward them.

Honoring the past without obeying it

We inherit so much from people we'll never meet—buildings they designed, systems they fought for, knowledge they painstakingly gathered. But Kass points at something uncomfortable: we often use "tradition" and "respect for the past" as conversation-stoppers. We're told not to question something because it's always been done that way, or because someone important believed it. The guilt can actually prevent us from thinking clearly.

This matters because we're stuck in a weird middle ground. We do live in the world they built, breathing air shaped by their choices. Yet pretending we owe them obedience doesn't honor anyone—it just freezes us in place. Real respect might mean taking what works, understanding why they chose it, and then deciding for ourselves. Your great-grandmother's recipe doesn't bind you. Her wisdom might, but only if it still makes sense to you.

The tricky part is that rejecting blind obligation doesn't mean rejecting everything old. It means looking at the past as a conversation partner, not a boss. You can learn from history without letting it run your life. That's actually harder than either blind reverence or casual dismissal—it requires thinking.