If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all. — Noam Chomsky

If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all.

Author: Noam Chomsky

Insight: Most of us think we're for free speech until someone says something that makes our skin crawl. Then suddenly we get creative about exceptions. We convince ourselves that this person is different, or this situation is special, or surely hateful speech doesn't count. But that's where the principle gets tested, isn't it? It's easy to defend the rights of people you agree with—that's not really a test at all. The harder truth is that free speech only means something when it protects voices that genuinely disturb you. If you're only willing to defend expression from people in your tribe or whose ideas you find acceptable, you're not actually defending a principle. You're just protecting your own preferences. That's not freedom; that's just power with better PR. This doesn't mean you have to like what someone says or stay silent about it. Disagreement, criticism, and counter-speech are all part of how freedom works. But there's a crucial difference between saying "I think you're wrong" and saying "you shouldn't be allowed to speak." One is engagement; the other is just using whatever power you have to silence people. The moment we start making exceptions for people we despise, we're handing future censors a permission slip they'll happily use against us.

Free speech only works for people you hate

If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all.

Most of us think we're for free speech until someone says something that makes our skin crawl. Then suddenly we get creative about exceptions. We convince ourselves that this person is different, or this situation is special, or surely hateful speech doesn't count. But that's where the principle gets tested, isn't it? It's easy to defend the rights of people you agree with—that's not really a test at all.

The harder truth is that free speech only means something when it protects voices that genuinely disturb you. If you're only willing to defend expression from people in your tribe or whose ideas you find acceptable, you're not actually defending a principle. You're just protecting your own preferences. That's not freedom; that's just power with better PR.

This doesn't mean you have to like what someone says or stay silent about it. Disagreement, criticism, and counter-speech are all part of how freedom works. But there's a crucial difference between saying "I think you're wrong" and saying "you shouldn't be allowed to speak." One is engagement; the other is just using whatever power you have to silence people. The moment we start making exceptions for people we despise, we're handing future censors a permission slip they'll happily use against us.

AI generated

Comments

Sign in to leave a comment or reply to one.

Sign in

Noam Chomsky

Noam Chomsky (1928 - ) is an American linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, historian, and social critic. He is known for his groundbreaking work in linguistics, particularly in the theory of generative grammar, as well as his outspoken political activism and critique of mainstream media and government policies.

Graph

Related