I am sure that if the mothers of various nations could meet, there would be no more wars.

What proximity could prevent

There's something almost naive-sounding about this, yet it cuts at something real. Mothers across enemy lines do share something in common: they've held their own child and felt that particular weight of vulnerability. They've stayed up worrying. They know what it costs, in actual human terms, to lose someone. That knowledge—visceral, not theoretical—makes abstract arguments about national honor or strategic advantage feel hollow.

But here's where it gets complicated. This isn't really about mothers being naturally more peaceful. It's about what happens when you're forced to see the actual human cost of your side's decisions. Right now, we stay divided partly because we don't have to look each other in the face. We consume news through screens. We never meet the grandmother across the border whose grandson is the same age as ours. When leaders do meet, they're still performing for cameras. There's no real vulnerability, no moment where pretense drops away.

The deeper insight is that most of us would act differently if we couldn't avoid seeing consequences up close. We'd make different choices. We'd probably spend political capital differently. We don't lack compassion; we lack proximity. That's fixable in ways that changing human nature never could be.