All historical experience demonstrates the following: Our earth cannot be changed unless in the not too distant future an alteration in the consciousness of individuals is achieved.

Inner change precedes outer change

We tend to believe that big change requires big systems—better laws, smarter policies, different leaders. But Kung is pointing at something more unsettling: none of that sticks without something shifting inside people first. You can mandate equality, but if people still feel threatened by difference, the mandate becomes theater. You can create institutions designed for fairness, but if individuals remain convinced the system is rigged against them, they'll sabotage or ignore it.

What's tricky about this is that it cuts both ways. Yes, we need inner change to make outer change real. But waiting for everyone's consciousness to evolve before acting seems like an excuse for paralysis. The real work seems to be doing both at once—pushing for structural change while staying alert to whether you're actually becoming someone different through the process, or just trading one set of assumptions for another.

The unsettling part is recognizing this in yourself. You might genuinely want a fairer world but notice you're resistant to the specific people, places, or practices that might get you there. That gap between what you believe matters and how you actually live—that's where Kung is really pointing. Change starts there, quietly, before it shows up anywhere else.