I think music is so diverse today, and bands are so diverse. If you were a rock band in the Eighties, you kind of had to stick to one thing. Now, in this age of Coachella and European festivals and stuff, it's kind of anything goes, so that allowed us to try different things.

Genre walls came down, identity got harder

Music used to come with invisible guardrails. If you were a rock band, you had a lane—hard rock, or soft rock, or punk—and wandering out of it meant risking your identity and your audience. That constraint actually simplified things in a weird way. Everyone knew what to expect from you.

Today those walls have mostly dissolved. A band can drop a folk song, then a trap-influenced track, then something orchestral, and the internet doesn't collapse. Streaming platforms don't care about genre purity the way radio programmers once did. Festivals celebrate eclecticism. This sounds liberating, and it is, but it also means every artist faces a more complex question: what do we actually want to make, untethered from genre expectations?

The interesting part is how this freedom cuts both ways. Yes, you can experiment more freely. But you're also competing for attention in a landscape where everything is possible, so standing out requires something clearer than "we're a rock band." The constraint used to help define you; now you have to define yourself. That's genuinely harder, even if it's more honest about what musicians actually want to do.