Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves; and under the rule of a just God, cannot long... — Abraham Lincoln

Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves; and under the rule of a just God, cannot long retain it.

Author: Abraham Lincoln

Insight: We usually think of freedom as something you either have or don't have, like a light switch. But Lincoln is saying something stranger: that denying freedom to others is actually a kind of boomerang. If you're willing to restrict someone else's liberty—their right to choose, speak, or exist without interference—you're building a world where that same restriction can come back on you. You've basically forfeited your moral claim to protection. The unsettling part is how this plays out in ordinary life, not just in politics. When we justify why certain people shouldn't have a choice—whether it's about their body, beliefs, or future—we're weakening the logic that protects our own freedoms. We're saying freedom is conditional, and conditions can shift. The person who thinks some people don't deserve certain rights is betting they'll never find themselves in that "certain people" category. What makes this relevant now is that it suggests freedom isn't really about your circumstances—it's about what you're willing to defend for everyone. You can't genuinely secure your own freedom while building cages for others. Eventually, the cage comes home.

Source: Letter to Henry L. Pierce, April 6, 1859

Freedom denied becomes your own cage

Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves; and under the rule of a just God, cannot long retain it.

Abraham LincolnLetter to Henry L. Pierce, April 6, 1859

We usually think of freedom as something you either have or don't have, like a light switch. But Lincoln is saying something stranger: that denying freedom to others is actually a kind of boomerang. If you're willing to restrict someone else's liberty—their right to choose, speak, or exist without interference—you're building a world where that same restriction can come back on you. You've basically forfeited your moral claim to protection.

The unsettling part is how this plays out in ordinary life, not just in politics. When we justify why certain people shouldn't have a choice—whether it's about their body, beliefs, or future—we're weakening the logic that protects our own freedoms. We're saying freedom is conditional, and conditions can shift. The person who thinks some people don't deserve certain rights is betting they'll never find themselves in that "certain people" category.

What makes this relevant now is that it suggests freedom isn't really about your circumstances—it's about what you're willing to defend for everyone. You can't genuinely secure your own freedom while building cages for others. Eventually, the cage comes home.

AI generated

Comments

Sign in to leave a comment or reply to one.

Sign in

Abraham Lincoln

Abraham Lincoln was the 16th President of the United States, serving from 1861 until his assassination in 1865. He is best known for leading the country through the Civil War, preserving the Union, and issuing the Emancipation Proclamation that led to the abolition of slavery in the United States.

Graph

Related