I think you can make fun of anything except things people can't help. They can't help their race or their sex or their age, so you ridicule their pretension or their ego instead. You can ridicule ideas - ideas don't have feelings. You can ridicule an idea that someone holds without hurting them.

Target pretension, not circumstance

There's a real distinction being drawn here that cuts through a lot of modern confusion about what humor can and should do. The core insight is simple: target choices, not circumstances. You can mock someone's ridiculous business idea, their pretentious taste in wine, their inflated sense of importance. These are things they've decided to do or believe, and they can change them. But the things woven into someone's existence—their background, their body, how many years they've lived—those aren't negotiable. The discomfort comes from the helplessness.

What's interesting is how this actually defends humor rather than limiting it. This isn't about tiptoeing around everything; it's about sharpening where the jokes land. Some of the sharpest comedy targets exactly what this quote suggests: human pretension, contradiction, ego. We laugh at someone's pompousness or hypocrisy because we recognize something we've done ourselves. That recognition is what makes humor work.

The harder part is that it requires paying attention. It's easier to grab the surface-level difference and make that the punchline. What takes more effort—and more skill—is noticing the actual pretension underneath and going after that instead. That's what separates lazy humor from humor that actually lands.