New technology is not good or evil in and of itself. It's all about how people choose to use it. — David Wong

New technology is not good or evil in and of itself. It's all about how people choose to use it.

Author: David Wong

Insight: We're drawn to blame our tools for our problems because it feels cleaner than admitting we're the real variable. Social media is toxic, we say—as if the platform itself has opinions. But the same technology that lets you doom-scroll for hours also connects you to old friends, helps you build a business, or lets you learn something genuinely useful at 2 AM. The difference isn't the app. It's what you decided to do with it. This matters more now because the tools are faster and more persuasive than ever. A knife can harm or prepare dinner. A hammer builds or destroys. But algorithms? They're designed to keep you engaged, to nudge you toward outrage, to show you what you'll click. The seduction is built in. So saying "it's neutral" actually misses something important—not that technology is inherently evil, but that it's often deliberately shaped to push you in certain directions. That's why your actual choice becomes harder to make and more worth protecting. The honest version is messier: you're not just picking how to use a neutral thing. You're wrestling with something that's already lobbying for your attention. Knowing that difference is what makes you less likely to outsource your choices to whatever's glowing brightest in front of you.

Tools seduce, but you still choose

New technology is not good or evil in and of itself. It's all about how people choose to use it.

We're drawn to blame our tools for our problems because it feels cleaner than admitting we're the real variable. Social media is toxic, we say—as if the platform itself has opinions. But the same technology that lets you doom-scroll for hours also connects you to old friends, helps you build a business, or lets you learn something genuinely useful at 2 AM. The difference isn't the app. It's what you decided to do with it.

This matters more now because the tools are faster and more persuasive than ever. A knife can harm or prepare dinner. A hammer builds or destroys. But algorithms? They're designed to keep you engaged, to nudge you toward outrage, to show you what you'll click. The seduction is built in. So saying "it's neutral" actually misses something important—not that technology is inherently evil, but that it's often deliberately shaped to push you in certain directions. That's why your actual choice becomes harder to make and more worth protecting.

The honest version is messier: you're not just picking how to use a neutral thing. You're wrestling with something that's already lobbying for your attention. Knowing that difference is what makes you less likely to outsource your choices to whatever's glowing brightest in front of you.

AI generated

Comments

Sign in to leave a comment or reply to one.

Sign in

David Wong

David Wong is an author and editor best known for his work in the realm of contemporary fiction, particularly in the fantasy and horror genres. He gained significant recognition for his novels, including "John Dies at the End," which was adapted into a film, and for his contributions to the website Cracked.com, where he has published numerous humorous and thought-provoking articles. Wong's unique blend of wit and insight has garnered him a dedicated following in both literature and online media.

Graph

Related